← Search

Patrick Cherubin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Stockbridge, GA
3.0M year-end 2024
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
18 matches · 9W–9L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history18 matches
W
2026-10-23 · Sugar Creek (Tameka West)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ramsey Phillips mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-25 · Sugar Creek (Tameka West)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with TAMEKA WEST mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · Sugar Creek (Tameka West)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with TAMEKA WEST mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-17 · Sugar Creek (Tameka West)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with TAMEKA WEST mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-13 · Sugar Creek (Tameka West)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with TAMEKA WEST mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-09 · Sugar Creek (Tameka West)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with TAMEKA WEST mixed
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-10-17 · Sugar Creek (Tameka West)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tonya Saxon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-10-10 · Sugar Creek (Tameka West)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Evelyn Richards mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
Default
2025-09-19 · Sugar Creek (Tameka West)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittany Flanigan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with TAMEKA WEST mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Woods mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
W
2024-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with TAMEKA WEST mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.2% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 32.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova