← Search

Isabel Mosley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chesterfield, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 123W–19L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history142 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Fridley/Goldmann (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Mosley
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-18 · Fridley/Goldmann (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Mosley
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · Fridley/Goldmann (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany Quinlan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-04 · Fridley/Goldmann (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Mosley
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-13 · Fridley/Goldmann (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Mosley
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · Sandweiss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pj Panesar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · Schneller/Schmedeke · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Carney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Default
2026-07-29 · Sandweiss · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with McKenzie Rawden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-23 · Schneller/Schmedeke · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Carney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Sandweiss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Malik Hagens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · Schneller/Schmedeke · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Carney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · Sandweiss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Malik Hagens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.6% of games
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 53.1% of games
3.5
93.5%
29W–2L · 68.5% of games
4.0
88.6%
62W–8L · 61% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
88.9%
16W–2L · 61.9% of games
9.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams