← Search

Jonathan McDorman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Manakin Sabot, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 85W–22L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history107 matches
L
2026-10-31 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Greenspoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-27 · MAC Attack - Samson · #3 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-11 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Greenspoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-08 · MAC Attack - Samson · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-01 · MAC Attack - Samson · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-27 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Greenspoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-09-09 · Dream Team - Miranowicz · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeremy Calbreath
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-22 · Dream Team - Miranowicz · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Joyner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · VR Bon air - Regulagedda · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aric Mueller
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · Dream Team - Miranowicz · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Joyner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-04 · VR Bon air - Regulagedda · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Samson
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · Dream Team - Miranowicz · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Joyner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
90%
27W–3L · 62.5% of games
4.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 59.6% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.7% of games
7.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.6% of games
7.5mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 68.1% of games
8.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 58.9% of games
8.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 64.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
20 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert