← Search

Sang Kim

— year-end
60 matches · 29W–31L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sang Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-06-28 · HOCO - Bendall · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marian Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-19 · HOCO - Bendall · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patsy Bendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-14 · HOCO - Bendall · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
Brad Smith / Tamara Banks
2026-06-13 · HOCO - Bendall · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · HOCO - Bendall · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-26 · RS-HUNTER Spring 26 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-19 · RS-HUNTER Spring 26 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-12 · RS-HUNTER Spring 26 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-26 · RS-HUNTER Spring 26 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-19 · RS-HUNTER Spring 26 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-12 · RS-HUNTER Spring 26 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Benjamin Smith / Tuti Hawkins
2026-02-05 · HOCO-WHARTON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.1% of games
4.0
49%
25W–26L · 48.3% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#1 Singles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova