← Search

Youngeun Min

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LA Crescenta, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 62W–16L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history78 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Mixed Nuts/Hwang-Nichols/Fremont · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Nam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-29 · LA - Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Esther Hwang
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-15 · LA - Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Esther Hwang
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-27 · Mixed Nuts/Hwang-Nichols/Fremont · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Moon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · SFV LLW-Scholland Garros 7.0/Im-Kim/Fremont · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kwon S Yun mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · SFV LLW-Scholland Garros 7.0/Im-Kim/Fremont · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kwon S Yun mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-18 · SFV LLW-Scholland Garros 7.0/Im-Kim/Fremont · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kwon S Yun mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-09-16 · LA - Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Esther Hwang
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-30 · Mixed Nuts/Hwang-Nichols/Fremont · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Moon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · Scholland Garros Tri-Women/Im-Kim/Scholl · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hyo Jung Kim
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
Default
2026-08-23 · Scholland Garros Tri-Women/Im-Kim/Scholl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Esther Hwang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-23 · LA - Mixed Nuts · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Moon
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 75.9% of games
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.3% of games
4.0
80%
16W–4L · 61.4% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
85.7%
24W–4L · 65.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert