← Search

William Strull

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Rafael, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 9W–4L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history13 matches
L
2026-03-24 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jack Daley
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-18 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Denkler
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-06 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Sanchez
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-21 · MT TAM RC S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joel Sklar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-10-07 · MT TAM RC S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Deist
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-04-08 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Tischbern
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-04-10 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ramesh Mavelikalam
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
L
2024-04-01 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Engstrom
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2024-03-19 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Gumbiner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-04-14 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Lansky
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-04-12 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Denkler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2023-03-16 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Deist
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova