← Search

Micaela Banach

San Diego, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
57 matches · 34W–23L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.70
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
San Diego · 3.0
66 of 72
CA · 3.0
129 of 143
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Micaela is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Micaela has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Micaela has gone from the 46th to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 60.6% of games
3.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 50.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history57 matches
L
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacquelyn Isidore
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-1
W
Danielle Mannweiler / Marley Bennett
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Russell
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
Susan Waugh / Christine Zikachamps
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · with Abigail Smith
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-0
L
Jeanette Delaney / Brock Weaverchamps
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · with Abigail Smith
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
L
Noor Hilmi
2026-05-06 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
W
Lainie Reuter / Jane Lithopoulos
2026-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corinne Hoare
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 7-5
L
Jessica Sonbaty / May Salyards
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Parisi
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Valerie Craft / Deniz Ilkbasaran
2026-03-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Clifford
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-4
L
Lily Tang / Janet Murphy
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Breanna Herbers
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracey Beal
+0.036better than expected — took 56% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abigail Smith
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Farhana Pargac / Cindy Emanuelchamps
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · with Breanna Herbers
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.