Search

Emily Ridgway

Bozeman, MT
3.5C year-end 2025
23 matches · 9W–14L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.35
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
97%
stay 3.5
3%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.31. Lower than today’s 3.35 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Bozeman · 3.5
6 of 10
MT · 3.5
16 of 29
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Emily is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Emily has gone from the 13th to the 70th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
40%
8W–12L · 47.5% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history23 matches
L
Marcie Fitch / Terri Ruthruff
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Saros
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Jennifer Halvorson
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.004about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Arya Cavender / Alivia Ballenger
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Saros
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
L
Amanda Faure / Joy Inman
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Buss
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Natalie Van Dusen / Susie Boyer
2025-08-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diana Saros
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 3-3
L
Susie Boyer / Michelle Grocke
2025-08-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diana Saros
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Saros
+0.028better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Sandrah MacK / Sara Polanchek
2025-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Faye Nelson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Paula Vernon / Jan Schweitzer
2025-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Saros
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
Peggy Griffin / Katherine Plowman
2025-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Faye Nelson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 1-0
L
Susie Boyer / Kirsten Kainz
2024-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Maria King
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.