← Search

En Jang

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 26W–14L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history40 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Single Aceholes/Tran-Hebrew/Scholl · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-10-25 · Single Aceholes/Tran-Hebrew/Scholl · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-24 · SGV Queens of the Court-Jones-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carly Vong
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-10-18 · SGV Queens of the Court-Jones-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carly Vong
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-11 · Simply Smashing 3.0/MacEwan-Scott/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Jackson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-27 · Single Aceholes/Tran-Hebrew/Scholl · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-26 · SGV Queens of the Court-Jones-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carly Vong
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-18 · SFV LLW-Scholland Garros 7.0/Im-Kim/Fremont · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Moon mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-13 · Simply Smashing 3.0/MacEwan-Scott/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Nelson
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · SFV LLW-Scholland Garros 7.0/Im-Kim/Fremont · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jongjin Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-21 · Simply Smashing3.0/MacEwan/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Kennedy
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · SGV Queens of the Court-Jones-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
59.4%
19W–13L · 53.8% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.6% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 61% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
10 matches
#1 Singles
20%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
13%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe