← Search

Christine Malloy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Napa, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 58W–13L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history71 matches
W
2026-05-10 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane de Seve
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda DeBord
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samanda Dorger
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-30 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda DeBord
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-29 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane de Seve
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samanda Dorger
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Hoke
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-08 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edlira Muratas
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-04-04 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edlira Muratas championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · Smash Sisters/Fischer/Napa · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brie Cadman
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-03-20 · Smash Sisters/Fischer/Napa · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brie Cadman
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-18 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Herrera
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
9W–0L · 83.8% of games
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 74.3% of games
3.5
68%
17W–8L · 54.5% of games
5.5
90%
9W–1L · 78.2% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 68.3% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.2% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#1 Singles
11%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King