← Search

Michael Codsi

Shoreline, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 46W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Michael Codsi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-01 · Oklahoma · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · Oklahoma · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-10 · Oklahoma · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-05 · Oklahoma · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Oklahoma · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Michael Ford
2026-05-25 · Oklahoma · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-23 · HBSQ-Net Ninjas-Gibbs · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · HBSQ-Net Ninjas-Gibbs · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · Oklahoma · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-01 · HBSQ-Net Ninjas-Gibbs · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Hector Hernandez
2026-04-19 · Oklahoma · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-3
W
Aidan Plunkitt
2026-04-18 · HBSQ-Net Ninjas-Gibbs · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
69%
40W–18L · 60.6% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 63% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 63% of the time
#1 Singles
63%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#2 Singles
10%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer