← Search

Sloan Rehder

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 57W–57L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history114 matches
W
2026-10-21 · LCTA39/Pichon-Varin/Hamlin · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-10-20 · LCTA18/Rehder/Hamlin · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-18 · LCTA18/Rehder/Hamlin · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-15 · LCTA39/Andrews/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yann Jacquemont
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-10-14 · LCTA39/Pichon-Varin/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Sokoloski
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-10-12 · LCTA18/Rehder/Hamlin · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-08 · LCTA39/Andrews/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Brent
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-07 · LCTA39/Pichon-Varin/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Etienne Pichon-Varin
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Default
2026-10-02 · LCTA18/Dodson/Hamlin · #2 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-01 · LCTA39/Andrews/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yann Jacquemont
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-30 · LCTA39/Pichon-Varin/Hamlin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Dodson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-21 · LCTA18/Rehder/Hamlin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yann Jacquemont
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
40.8%
20W–29L · 50.4% of games
3.5
55%
22W–18L · 50% of games
6.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 58.9% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#1 Singles
16%
18 matches
#2 Singles
15%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova