← Search

Laura Sisay

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 42W–40L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history82 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Hempfield Sweet Spotters (Culp) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Swank
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-30 · Hempfield Sweet Spotters (Culp) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Birk
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-18 · Hempfield - Hauck · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Bridgeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-10-11 · Hempfield - Hauck · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Bridgeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-10 · Hempfield Penn Pals (Culp) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Himes
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-04 · Hempfield - Hauck · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Reese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-03 · Hempfield Penn Pals (Culp) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Potutschnig
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-12 · Hempfield Sweet Spotters (Culp) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Franko
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-11 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Curtis
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Curtis
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Baxter
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-27 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Birk
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
60%
9W–6L · 53% of games
3.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 47.7% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.0
80%
4W–1L · 71.2% of games
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
18 matches
#1 Singles
15%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe