← Search

Shan Chun Wen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, WI
3.0M year-end 2023
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
11 matches · 3W–8L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history11 matches
L
2026-07-17 · WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 Hu · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenny Bradley mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-11 · WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 Hu · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mei Hu mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 Hu · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenny Bradley mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-06-12 · WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 Hu · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Simon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 Hu · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leane Tyska mixed
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2023-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ji Ae Ahn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ji Ae Ahn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ji Ae Ahn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ji Ae Ahn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Thomson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elma Sia mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 35.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams