← Search

Matt Chavez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fresno, CA
3.5A year-end 2023
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
43 matches · 22W–21L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history43 matches
L
2026-05-30 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 18AM3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phillip Tapia
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-24 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 18AM3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Kim
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-15 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 18AM3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Kim
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-07 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 18AM3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Kim
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-30 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 18AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chai Her
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janene Armas mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-04-13 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 18AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chai Her
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-15 · ROEDING PK 18MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alyssa Marie R Chern mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-04 · ROEDING PK 18MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Vor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-01 · ROEDING PK 18MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janene Armas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-25 · ROEDING PK 18MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charmaine Anne Ramirez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-15 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jasmine Daza mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 65.4% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.4% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.9% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
9 matches
Singles
19%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova