← Search

William Bell

— year-end
13 matches · 2W–11L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add William Bell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history13 matches
L
2026-08-28 · Appel · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine De Peuter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-14 · Appel · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine De Peuter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-06 · Elcock · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Randall Henigin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · Farooq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Curt Schwab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-30 · Elcock · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raymond Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · Elcock/Toro · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aleksey Pletnev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · Elcock · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Randall Henigin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · Elcock/Toro · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Damien Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · Elcock · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stan Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6
L
2026-06-17 · Elcock/Toro · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Damien Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-11 · Elcock · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Mullennix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · Elcock · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Randall Henigin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams10 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 27.9% of games
6.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 34.5% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 69% of the time
#2 Doubles
69%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova