← Search

Elizabeth Danowski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 24W–14L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history38 matches
W
2026-10-24 · MAC Mavericks Bates · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jon Carrier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-23 · Stonehenge Danowski · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-10-18 · MAC Mavericks Bates · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with A Felton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-04 · MAC Mavericks Bates · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jon Carrier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-10-01 · Stonehenge Danowski · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-24 · Stonehenge Danowski · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-12 · Belmont Beauties Bates · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Scott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · Stonehenge Swingers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vickie Hall
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · Belmont Beauties Bates · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Staton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · Belmont Beauties Bates · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Huss
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Stonehenge Swingers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vickie Hall
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-24 · Stonehenge Swingers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vickie Hall
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 66.7% of games
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 74.2% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 37.5% of games
5.5
50%
3W–3L · 53% of games
6.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.7% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.6% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
13 matches
#1 Singles
24%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer