← Search

Meagan Ellerman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hoover, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 61W–12L · seasons 2023–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-10-21 · HCC - Ellerman/Minor · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-20 · HCC - Ellerman/Minor · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-30 · HCC - Ellerman/Minor · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-29 · HCC - Ellerman/Minor · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lena Martinez championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-21 · HCC - Connelly · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lena Martinez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-14 · HCC - Connelly · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lena Martinez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · HCC - Connelly · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Johnston
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · HCC - Connelly/Goetz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Pugh
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · HCC - Connelly/Goetz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Cole
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · HCC - Connelly/Goetz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Mitchell
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-27 · HCC - Connelly/Goetz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Pugh
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 80% of games
3.0
87.5%
28W–4L · 75.1% of games
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 67.8% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 74.7% of games
6.5
60%
6W–4L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
23 matches
#1 Singles
21%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#2 Singles
14%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal