← Search

Ariana Garcia

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Downey, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 58W–42L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history100 matches
L
2026-10-24 · SGV Sloppy Topspin-Higuera-Downey HS/SA 8 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha De La Rosa
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-24 · SGV HFA Dynasty -Salas-Downey High School/SA8 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sergio Salas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-17 · SGV Sloppy Topspin-Higuera-Downey HS/SA 8 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Quesada
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-04 · SGV Sloppy Topspin-Higuera-Downey HS/SA 8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha De La Rosa
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-26 · SGV Sloppy Topspin-Higuera-Downey HS/SA 8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha De La Rosa
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · SGV HFA Dynasty -Salas-Downey High School/SA8 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sergio Salas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-19 · SGV Sloppy Topspin-Higuera-Downey HS/SA 8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha De La Rosa
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-19 · SGV HFA Dynasty -Salas-Downey High School/SA8 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jesus Gomez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · SGV Sloppy Topspin-Higuera-Downey HS/SA 8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha De La Rosa
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-23 · SGV HFA Choppy Topspin-Higuera-Downey HS/SA8:30 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samantha De La Rosa
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-01 · SGV HFA Choppy Topspin-Higuera-Downey HS/SA8:30 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samantha De La Rosa
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · SGV HFA Choppy Topspin-Higuera-Downey HS/SA8:30 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megumi Kodama
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.9% of games
3.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 57.5% of games
3.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 48.5% of games
2.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 59.4% of games
5.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert