← Search

JP Blangy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Houston, TX
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
16 matches · 3W–13L · seasons 2023–2025
Match history16 matches
L
2025-11-09 · Pine Forest - 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Balke mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-12 · Pine Forest - 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Griffith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-05 · Pine Forest - 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Cepero mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-17 · Pine Forest - Set2Win · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Balke mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-10 · Pine Forest - Set2Win · #4 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Cepero mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-27 · Pine Forest - Set2Win · #4 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Cepero mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-10-13 · Pine Forest - Set2Win · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Blangy mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W
2024-04-07 · Pine Forest - Set2Win · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Blangy mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-03-24 · Pine Forest - Set2Win · #4 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanette MacK mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-02-25 · Pine Forest - Set2Win · #4 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanette MacK mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-02-11 · Pine Forest - Set2Win · #4 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda Carpenter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-02-04 · Pine Forest - Set2Win · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Blangy mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0mixed
18.8%
3W–13L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert