← Search

Deb Siewing

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 104W–40L · seasons 2023–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history144 matches
L
2026-10-10 · Lemp/Grigg · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Norma Feldman
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-5
W
2026-10-03 · Lemp/Grigg · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Norma Feldman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-26 · Lemp/Grigg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Schutte
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · Lemp/Grigg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Schutte
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-13 · Hardebeck-White (F) · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · Lemp/Grigg · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Grigg
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-2
W
2026-07-24 · White/Hardebeck · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Norma Feldman championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-0
W
2026-07-19 · STL/Lemp-Pyatt/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Grigg championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · STL/Lemp-Pyatt/55&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Grigg championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · STL/Lemp-Pyatt/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Grigg championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-17 · STL/Lemp-Pyatt/55&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Grigg championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 74.6% of games
3.5
76.5%
62W–19L · 62% of games
4.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 43.5% of games
7.0
84%
21W–4L · 63.8% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
51 matches
#2 Singles
18%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
17 matches
Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer