Search

Lauren Blazar

Mission Hills, KS
5.0C year-end 2025
99 matches · 76W–23L · seasons 20242026
Where Lauren sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Lauren is one of 66 women at 5.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams19 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lauren has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

4.04.55.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Lauren has gone from the 74th to the 96th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.6% of games
4.5
80.7%
46W–11L · 63.5% of games
5.0
50%
4W–4L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history99 matches
W
Kristen Paulmeyerchamps
2026-06-02 · #1 Singles
+0.042better than expected — took 100% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Ana Lucia Barraza
2026-05-20 · #1 Singles · 5.0
+0.026better than expected — took 38% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 4-2
W
Callie Bennett / Lyndy Volker
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alexis Bernthal
+0.026better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 2-5, 1-0
W
Mariana Ochoa Guerra
2026-04-29 · #1 Singles · 5.0
+0.072better than expected — took 57% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 1-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-03-10 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kathryn Bannister
0.187about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Tina Bond / Kristin Stoddardchamps
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · with Erin Gustafson
+0.008better than expected — took 68% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · with Mallory Plungkhen
+0.013about as expected — took 52% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Shannon Rogers / Katelyn Sweeney Chingchamps
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · with Paige Salveter
0.064below expectation — took 29% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Gwyneth Gifford / Valerie Marks
2026-02-24 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Cheryl Liang Burns
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Mariana Ochoa Guerra / Denise Chiao
2026-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Cheryl Liang Burns
+0.025better than expected — took 53% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 4-2, 1-0
L
Michelle Gifford / Gwyneth Gifford
2026-01-20 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Bree Moseley
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Marti Lansford / Sofia Aguilera Tovar
2026-01-13 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Cheryl Liang Burns
0.032below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.