← Search

Mariko Tsuyuki

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Noblesville, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 81W–55L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history136 matches
W
2026-11-02 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Inselberg · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Li
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-11-01 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Burns
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-30 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chaowapong Jarasvaraparn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-09 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chaowapong Jarasvaraparn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-05 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Inselberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yoshimi Moriyuki
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-09-18 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephen Short mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-03 · Low Tri W IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jill Chlystun
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-27 · Low Tri W IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allison Ditto
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Yating Jiang
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-03 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kate Li
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keenan Copeland championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-27 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taeko Escasa championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2024–2027
Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Inselberg
Early Start Fall CITA Indy Adult 40 & Over · CITA Indy 40 & Over 3.5 Women, F · 40+
2027
Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Inselberg
Early Start Fall CITA Indy Adult 40 & Over · CITA Indy 40 & Over 4.0 Women, F · 40+
2027
CIN A40 3.5W M IRCD Faulkenberg
Early Start Fall CITA Indy Adult 40 & Over · CITA Indy 40 & Over 3.5 Women, F · 40+
2026
Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Gupta
Spring USTA Central Indiana Combo · CIN Indy Combo 7.5 Women, SP
2026
Indy A18 3.5W SAT IRCD Faulkenberg
Winter USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CITA Indy 18 & Over 3.5 Women, W · 18+
2026
Indy A18 4.0W TUE IRCD Gupta
Winter USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CITA Indy 18 & Over 4.0 Women, W · 18+
2026
Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Inselberg
Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 40 & Over · CIN Indy 40 & Over 3.5 Women, S · 40+
2026
Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg
Fall USTA Central Indiana Combo Adult · CIN Indianapolis Combo 7.5 Women, F
2026
Indy CX 7.5 IRCD Copeland
Fall USTA Central Indiana Combo Mixed · CIN Indy Adult Combo Mixed 7.5
2026
Indy X18 7.0 IRCD Copeland
Winter USTA Central Indiana Mixed 18 & Over · CITA Indy Mixed 18 & Over 7.0, W · 18+
2026
Indy X18 7.0X IRCD Copeland
Summer USTA Central Indiana Mixed 18 & Over · CIN Indy Mixed 18 & Over 7.0, S · 18+
2026
Indy X40 7.0 IRCD Copeland
Spring USTA Central Indiana Mixed 40 & Over · CIN Indy Mixed 40 & Over 7.0, SP · 40+
2026
Low Tri W IRCD Gupta
Late Summer USTA Central Indiana Tri-Level · CIN Indy Women's Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0
2026
Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg
Late Summer USTA Central Indiana Tri-Level · CIN Indy Women's Tri-Level 3.5/4.0/4.5
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 51.9% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
64.1%
25W–14L · 55.2% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.7% of games
7.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 48% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 61.5% of games
7.0mixed
63.2%
24W–14L · 55.5% of games
7.5mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 31.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
29 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams