← Search

Beth Loveday

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sarasota, FL
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 5W–12L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history17 matches
W
2026-10-23 · Payne Park Huelster 65 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Stasiak
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · Payne Park Huelster 65 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Kessler
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-09 · Payne Park Huelster 65 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Huelster
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-10-02 · Payne Park Huelster 65 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie Guillet
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-25 · Payne Park Huelster 65 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie Guillet
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-18 · GT Bray Socialites · #3 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Lacroix
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-11 · GT Bray Socialites · #3 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Lacroix
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-26 · Payne Park King · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sheryl King
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-29 · Payne Park King · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with RENEE NADIV
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-21 · Payne Park King · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Harcke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-01-08 · Payne Park King · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with RENEE NADIV
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 5-7
L
2023-12-11 · Payne Park Gems · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jean Lacroix
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 40.5% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 65% of the time
#2 Doubles
65%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
12%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal