← Search

Brian Hamilton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oreland, PA
3.5S year-end 2024
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
17 matches · 10W–7L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history17 matches
W
2026-02-21 · Scoopers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Heeter mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · Scoopers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Heeter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-5, 1-0
L
2025-04-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Heeter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sueli Vieira mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meena Dattarajan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanette Soriano mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Satish Shanmugam
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2021-05-22 · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2021-05-15 · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2019-06-15 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2019-06-08 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
David Jordan / Joe Venneri
2019-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ozair Ibrahim
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.1% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#2 Singles
24%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal