← Search

Jeremy HACKWORTH

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Imperial Beach, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 50W–33L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history83 matches
W
2026-10-25 · SD 3.5 Coronado TC (10:30AM)/ Kamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Domingo
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-10-18 · SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ Hackworth · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Fahrenthold
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-04 · SD 3.5 Coronado TC (10:30AM)/ Kamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Domingo
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-26 · SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ Hackworth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theodore Gilmore
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-09-20 · SD 3.5 Coronado TC (10:30AM)/ Kamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Torres
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-07 · SDNC LLW 7.0 Kit Carson Park Rangers/ Warren · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Felix championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-06 · SDNC LLW 7.0 Kit Carson Park Rangers/ Warren · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Felix championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-09-06 · SDNC LLW 7.0 Kit Carson Park Rangers/ Warren · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Walker championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-05 · SDNC LLW 7.0 Kit Carson Park Rangers/ Warren · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Zimmerman championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · IB Jeremy Hackworth · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-17 · IB Jeremy Hackworth · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · SDNC LLW 7.0 Kit Carson Park Rangers/ Warren · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Zimmerman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
70%
42W–18L · 58% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 43.2% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.3% of games
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 35.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 34% of the time
#1 Singles
34%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe