← Search

Cedrick Timmons

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pamplico, SC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 13W–10L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history23 matches
W
2026-05-19 · PD18/Anderson/FTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phillip Boyer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · PD18/Anderson/FTC · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-13 · PD18/Anderson/FTC · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · PD18/Anderson/FTC · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-03-07 · PD18/Anderson/FTC · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-28 · PD18/Anderson/FTC · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-02-07 · PD18/Anderson/FTC · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-03 · PD18/Smith/FTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Cheng mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-20 · PD18/Smith/FTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ning Wharton mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-06-22 · PD18/Smith/FTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Dynan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-06-04 · PD18/Smith/FTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Dynan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-07-21 · PD18/Huang/FTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Broach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.2% of games
3.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 48% of the time
#1 Singles
48%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#2 Singles
17%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams