← Search

Jennifer Hawthorne

— year-end
45 matches · 22W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Hawthorne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-06-30 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Brkic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stefenie Block
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-07 · O'Neill/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Berkenstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-30 · O'Neill/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn O'Neill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-29 · Price/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Pickett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · Price/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charissa Derieg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-16 · O'Neill/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Berkenstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-15 · Price/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charissa Derieg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-01 · Price/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashleigh Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-26 · O'Neill/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teri Hirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · Price/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashleigh Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.1% of games
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 49.2% of games
5.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.9% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer