← Search

Susenmarie Ladd

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Kalispell, MT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
7 matches · 6W–1L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history7 matches
W
2026-05-31 · Coco's Sinners · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Randy Sugarman mixed
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · Coco's Sinners · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Randy Sugarman mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-30 · Coco's Sinners · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Randy Sugarman mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-08-10 · Glacier Acers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Hyer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-08-09 · Glacier Acers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Krill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-08-09 · Glacier Acers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindy Small
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-08-08 · Glacier Acers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Hyer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 53.6% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal