← Search

Cody Coggins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 46W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Howe championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Warren championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-30 · Sides/FR/mixed tri 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bailey Wolff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · Sides/FR/mixed tri 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Bailey Wolff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Sanditen/LF/tri 4.0 M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Kossman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-16 · Sides/FR/mixed tri 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Caroline Kelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-13 · Tulsa/Bristow/SH/tri men 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Bird
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · Sanditen/LF/tri 4.0 M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dru Prosser
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-02 · Sides/FR/mixed tri 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Emily Hale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · Sanditen/LF/tri 4.0 M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Kossman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · Tulsa/Bristow/SH/tri men 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Hawkins
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · Hale/LF 18s 7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Hale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.5% of games
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 62.5% of games
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.2% of games
4.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.5% of games
5.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.2% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.5% of games
8.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 75.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#1 Singles
14%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert