← Search

Felicia Kappes

San Diego, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 82W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Felicia Kappes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-09-06 · SDNC LT FRCC/ Caringal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Ruttenber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-2
W
2026-08-24 · SDNC LT FRCC/ Caringal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hackett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-23 · SDNC LT FRCC/ Caringal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danna Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · SDNC LT FRCC/ Caringal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Hatch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-16 · SD 7.0 FRCC/ Hackett · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Hackett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · SDNC LT FRCC/ Caringal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hackett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · SDNC LT FRCC/ Caringal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hackett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Alison Pasiut championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · with Alison Pasiut championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Kara Hatch championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-20 · SDNC LT FRCC/ Caringal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Salma Ott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · SDNC LT FRCC/ Caringal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ping Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
87.2%
34W–5L · 63.1% of games
3.5
82.1%
23W–5L · 62.4% of games
6.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 67.5% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer