← Search

Brian Langsdorf

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 39W–31L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history70 matches
L
2026-11-01 · NWO 6.5M Combo Saini/Dakhawe-SVC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Trevor Bruning
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
W
Default
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5M Combo Saini/Dakhawe-SVC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Noah Rife
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-09-10 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacey Kiel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-03 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Gauthier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-20 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacey Kiel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Gauthier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.0M Patel/Naus-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Felgner championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.0M Patel/Naus-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Felgner championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 3.0M Jacobs-Southview · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Hernandez
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · NWO 18&Over 3.0M Jacobs-Southview · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Smith
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Saini/Dakhawe-AW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gilbert Rangel Jr
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · NWO 18&Over 3.0M Jacobs-Southview · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Hernandez
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
51.4%
18W–17L · 48.8% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert