← Search

Or Bar-Ziv

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 43W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-10-07 · LCTA39/Wright-Harris/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Wright
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-10 · LCTA40/Wright/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Everett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-21 · LCTA40/Wright/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Everett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-06-22 · LCTA (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Howle) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Keeler McNeill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-04 · LCTA (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Howle) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Becker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Wright championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-15 · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · LCTA40/Wright-Harris/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Makowsky
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-27 · LCTA40/Wright-Harris/Maybank · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-03-25 · LCTA40/Wright-Harris/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Wright
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-11 · LCTA40/Wright-Harris/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Wright
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-07 · LCTA40/Wright-Harris/Maybank · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 77.8% of games
3.5
65.7%
23W–12L · 58.4% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 66.2% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.6% of games
3.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams