← Search

Garth Neilsen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Valley City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 31W–13L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history44 matches
L
2026-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shawn Turner championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Osborn
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Hansen
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelvin Nilsen
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
Default
2026-08-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelvin Nilsen
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Eyre
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Eyre
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Katsuo Togawa / John Wong
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Boyack championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Lebrecht championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Miller championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 59.6% of games
6.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 61.7% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#2 Singles
11%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer