← Search

Susanne Kramer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Phoenixville, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 11W–1L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history12 matches
W
2026-06-14 · Valley Creek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Janiec
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-10 · Valley Creek · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marianne Bartlett
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-08-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Janiec
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Janiec
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Janiec
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Reilly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-05-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Smyth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Romano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-08-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lois McCaskey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-08-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Janiec
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Quake
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Palmer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 63.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 58% of the time
#3 Doubles
58%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer