← Search

Clifford Simms

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Castle Pines, CO
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 9W–7L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history16 matches
L
2026-06-28 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Mervak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · GAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Sandstrom
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-14 · GAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Gribbon
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-07 · GAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Sandstrom
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-30 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Lord
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · GAC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Dudek
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · GAC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Kozik
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-11 · GAC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Raemer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-21 · GAC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Patton
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-10 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russell Stewart
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-07-03 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Gleichenhaus
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-05-08 · GAC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Sandstrom
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.5% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 56% of the time
#2 Doubles
56%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe