← Search

Kim Brighton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Austin, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 26W–19L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history45 matches
W
2026-10-11 · Waterloo TC · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Brighton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-27 · Waterloo TC · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Thome mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-13 · Waterloo TC · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Brighton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · Waterloo TC · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Brighton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · Racquet Riot 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Webb
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Default
2026-06-07 · Racquet Riot 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Kessinger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-07 · Waterloo TC · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Brighton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-31 · Waterloo TC · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Brighton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · Waterloo TC · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Brighton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-16 · Racquet Riot 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Kessinger
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Racquet Riot 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lydia Penturf
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · Racquet Riot 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Kessinger
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 61.4% of games
3.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 52.2% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert