← Search

Leonina Micale

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alpharetta, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 7W–10L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history17 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Laurel Springs (Katherine Atwood)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-25 · Laurel Springs (Katherine Atwood)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · Laurel Springs (Katherine Atwood)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-11 · Laurel Springs (Katherine Atwood)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-04 · Laurel Springs (Katherine Atwood)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-29 · Laurel Springs (Katherine Atwood)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · Laurel Springs (Katherine Atwood)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-12-12 · Laurel Springs (Suzanne Sarkady)* · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Mcbrayer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-12-09 · Laurel Springs (Suzanne Sarkady)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Lee
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 6-2
L
2025-12-04 · Laurel Springs (Holly Lee)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Klosterman
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-18 · Laurel Springs (Suzanne Sarkady)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aubree Gaynor
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 6-4
L
2025-11-13 · Laurel Springs (Holly Lee)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Brittany Schmitz
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 57.9% of games
3.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 53% of the time
#1 Singles
53%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova