← Search

Virgie Lacanlale

Lake Tapps, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
41 matches · 24W–17L · seasons 2025–2026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.59
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
13%
stay 2.5
87%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 58% stay · 42% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.48. Lower than today’s 2.59 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 2.5
70 of 197

Virgie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Virgie has been a steady 2.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.02.520252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Virgie has gone from the 29th to the 79th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 52.5% of games
3.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 49.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Meyer
+0.003about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Meyer
−0.006below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joe Chapin
+0.000better than expected — took 72% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Singles · 2.5
−0.046below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Tiffany Cunningham
2026-07-02 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-5
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Singles · 2.5
−0.014below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Anne Marie Stedham / Laurie Corwin
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Brucker
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-3
W
Allie Picha / Liz Imholt
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Dominique Mansilla Hermann
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Barnes / Elizabeth Martin
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Brucker
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 7-5
W
Lauren Barker
2026-06-05 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Meyer
+0.037better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joe Chapin
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.