← Search

Maggie Cronin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lititz, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 53W–10L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history63 matches
W
2026-10-29 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kara Schama
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-24 · Bent Creek - Triple the Trouble (Pasic) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Schama
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-23 · Bent Creek - Bilson/Ray · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Kauffman
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-22 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kara Schama
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-14 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Borza
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-09 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Borza
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-01 · Bent Creek - Bilson/Ray · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kara Schama
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-29 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kara Schama
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-21 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heather Shelton
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Zuckerman
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Kauffman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · Bent Creek - Bilson/Ray · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Schama championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 64.6% of games
3.0
90%
18W–2L · 63.8% of games
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.1% of games
5.0
100%
7W–0L · 71% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.1% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60.7% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
23 matches
#1 Singles
11%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe