← Search

Barry Beder

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
East Falmouth, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 4W–7L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history11 matches
W
2026-10-31 · FSC:FalmouthLobsters:Sugar:Beder · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Bilger
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-17 · FSC:FalmouthLobsters:Sugar:Beder · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Bilger
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-31 · FSC:TheFalmouthLobsters:Sugar:Beder · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Muma
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-17 · FSC:TheFalmouthLobsters:Sugar:Beder · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Richman
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-13 · FSC:TheFalmouthLobsters:Sugar:Beder · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Needham
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2025-11-15 · FSC:TheFalmouthLobsters:Sugar:Beder · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Terry
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-11-01 · FSC:TheFalmouthLobsters:Sugar:Beder · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Ogilvy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-01 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar/Muma · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Larsen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-15 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar/Muma · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Skudder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-01-25 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar/Muma · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Galat
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-01-18 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar/Muma · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Bilger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 0-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams