← Search

Eren Erkalkan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Walnut Creek, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 32W–18L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history50 matches
W
2026-10-24 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ron Wyatt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-10-10 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrey Izmaylov
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-10-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Derek Daymond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with J Patrick Forden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-18 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sreevisakh Muraleedharan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-13 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Derek Daymond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-11 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Derek Daymond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rudy Haluza
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
Default
2026-06-14 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Nolan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-11 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rudy Haluza
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-10 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-02 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Zilka
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 59.5% of games
4.0
45%
9W–11L · 53.4% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 57.1% of games
7.5
50%
5W–5L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#1 Singles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer