← Search

Randy Merrell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Santa Rosa, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 3W–9L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history12 matches
L
2026-05-24 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Gallenson
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Castaldi
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Weinberger
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Loudon
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-05 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chad Thistle
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-28 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Castaldi
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-05-25 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregory Jahn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-11 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Gallenson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-04 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with P Charles Seymour
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-20 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Oi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-19 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with P Charles Seymour
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-04-05 · FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Gunderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
25%
3W–9L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King