← Search

Rachael Craven

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlottesville, VA
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
25 matches · 10W–15L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history25 matches
W
2026-06-10 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Gunter
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Cowen
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-06-01 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Loring Woodriff
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Hay Hardy
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Gunter
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-06 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-22 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Murphy
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-08 · FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Murphy
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-05 · Farmington- Craven · #1 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
2-4
W
2025-08-05 · Cowen- Farmington - Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Caroline Childers
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-07-29 · Cowen- Farmington - Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Holzman
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-10 · Farmington Lobs of Fun-Cowen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Cowen
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 50% of games
3.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#2 Singles
12%
3 matches
#1 Singles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova