← Search

Liz Mcnair

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chatham, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 12W–13L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history25 matches
W
2026-10-22 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Audrey Gandini
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-4
L
2026-09-27 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tina Leardi championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-27 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tina Leardi championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-26 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Netty Hoagland championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-06 · MCAC:BlueLaces:Hoagland · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Metta
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-30 · MCAC:BlueLaces:Hoagland · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rosanne Panio
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · MCAC:BlueLaces:Hoagland · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Mingle
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · MCAC:BlueLaces:Hoagland · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elaine Brennan
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-02 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tina Leardi
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tina Leardi
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Netty Hoagland
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-2
W
2026-06-04 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Cronin
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 31.3% of games
6.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.1% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova