← Search

Emily Carlson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Atlanta, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 16W–4L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history20 matches
W
2026-07-09 · Chastain Park (Catherine Brown)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · Chastain Park (Catherine Brown)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · Chastain Park (Catherine Brown)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lewis
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · Chastain Park (Catherine Brown)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · Chastain Park (Catherine Brown)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-05 · Chastain TC (Catherine Brown)* · #1 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-29 · Chastain TC (Catherine Brown)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Brown championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-17 · Chastain (Jill MacRae)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-17 · Chastain (Jill MacRae)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-01-15 · Chastain TC (Catherine Brown)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Flaum
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-08 · Chastain TC (Catherine Brown)* · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-12-11 · Chastain TC (Catherine Brown)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Flaum
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 70.6% of games
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 59.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 75% of the time
#1 Singles
75%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
1 match
#4 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova