← Search

Natalie Kaplan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Slc, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
4 matches · 2W–2L · seasons 2025–2025
Match history4 matches
W
2025-10-11 · Liberty Park-Tieff · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Utgaard
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-09-27 · Liberty Park-Tieff · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Cole
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-07 · Liberty Park-Nelson/Utgaard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Nelson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-07-17 · Liberty Park-Nelson/Utgaard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Smelko
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2025–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
1 match
#2 Doubles
25%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams