← Search

Jake Junot

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pensacola, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
9 matches · 3W–6L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history9 matches
L
2026-10-22 · Davis - RS Hard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arthur Lao
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-07 · Davis - RS Hard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Meekins
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-09-10 · Davis - RS Hard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Davis
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-02 · Davis - RS Hard · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Troy Gill
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-20 · Davis - RS Hard · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Troy Gill
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-11-11 · Davis - RS Hard · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rick Bucco
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-04 · Davis - RS Hard · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-21 · Davis - RS Hard · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with JOHNNY DICKSON
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-14 · Davis - RS Hard · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ryan Tilley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer