← Search

Rodrigo Matias

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Melbourne, FL
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
55 matches · 16W–39L · seasons 2026–2026
Match history55 matches
L
2026-10-29 · Fee - Geddam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Isaac Vergara
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-22 · Fee - Geddam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Thein
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-10-14 · Fee - Matias · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fabio Raboneze
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-12 · Fee - Matias · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Dovell
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-27 · Rodrigo Matias · #1 Singles · 0.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-09-10 · Fee - Matias · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Davi Silva
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-09-09 · Fee - Matias · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mason Ballou
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-03 · Fee - Matias · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rodrigo Gustavo Martins Vieira
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-09 · Fee - Matias · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Fabio Raboneze
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-29 · Rodrigo Matias · #1 Singles · 0.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · Rodrigo Matias · #1 Singles · 0.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · Rodrigo Matias · #1 Singles · 0.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 42.2% of games
3.0
50%
6W–6L · 47% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0%
0W–5L · 28.7% of games
6.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
4 matches
Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova