← Search

Phil Payne

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BLOWING ROCK, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 98W–32L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history130 matches
W
Default
2026-10-08 · LKHA-Haynes/CSD 55+ 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bo Chriscoe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-26 · LKHA-Haynes/CSD 40+ 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bo Chriscoe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
Default
2026-09-19 · LKHA-Haynes/CSD 40+ 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andy Forsyth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-09-10 · LKHA-Haynes/CSD 55+ 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bo Chriscoe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · LKHA-Haynes/CSD 55+ 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andy Forsyth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-27 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Johan Gedlitschka championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Greg Fess / John Stanley Bailey
2026-06-27 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with William Calhoun championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-26 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Johan Gedlitschka championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · LKHA-Haynes/ CSD Spartan 40+ 4.5 Sat · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Ehmcke championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · LKHA-Haynes/ CSD Spartan 40+ 4.5 Sat · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Ehmcke championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · LKHA-Haynes/ CSD Spartan 40+ 4.5 Sat · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Ehmcke championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with William Calhoun championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 63.4% of games
4.5
90.6%
48W–5L · 65.5% of games
5.0
0%
0W–10L · 29.4% of games
8.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 66.1% of games
9.0
70%
7W–3L · 63.3% of games
9.5
40%
2W–3L · 51.5% of games
9.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
24 matches
Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams